DecepticonDon
06-17-2010, 03:17 PM
http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/2085/
Two refineries owned by oil giant BP account for 97 percent of all flagrant violations found in the refining industry by government safety inspectors over the past three years, a Center for Public Integrity analysis shows. Most of BP’s citations were classified as “egregious willful” by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and reflect alleged violations of a rule designed to prevent catastrophic events at refineries.
BP is battling a massive oil well spill in the Gulf of Mexico after an April 20 platform blast that killed 11 workers. But the firm has been under intense OSHA scrutiny since its refinery in Texas City, Texas, exploded in March 2005, killing 15 workers. While continuing its probe in Texas City, OSHA launched a nationwide refinery inspection program in June 2007 in response to a series of fires, explosions and chemical releases throughout the industry.
Refinery inspection data obtained by the Center under the Freedom of Information Act for OSHA’s nationwide program and for the parallel Texas City inspection show that BP received a total of 862 citations between June 2007 and February 2010 for alleged violations at its refineries in Texas City and Toledo, Ohio.
Of those, 760 were classified as “egregious willful” and 69 were classified as “willful.” Thirty of the BP citations were deemed “serious” and three were unclassified. Virtually all of the citations were for alleged violations of OSHA’s process safety management standard, a sweeping rule governing everything from storage of flammable liquids to emergency shutdown systems. BP accounted for 829 of the 851 willful violations among all refiners cited by OSHA during the period analyzed by the Center.
Top OSHA officials told the Center in an interview that BP was cited for more egregious willful violations than other refiners because it failed to correct the types of problems that led to the 2005 Texas City accident even after OSHA pointed them out. In Toledo, problems were corrected in one part of the refinery but went unaddressed in another. Jordan Barab, deputy assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health, said it was clear that BP “didn’t go nearly far enough” to correct deficiencies after the 2005 blast.
“The only thing you can conclude is that BP has a serious, systemic safety problem in their company,” Barab said.
If BP was sooooooo unsafe, why didn't OSHA shut them down?
I love how after any disaster, OSHA is right there with lists of violations. Yet action by OSHA(other than fines) could possibly have prevented this and many tragedies.
Locally, I can recall the 2008 Imperial sugar refinery explosion in Savannah.
After the fact, OSHA issued numerous citations and fines.
Just found this. seems that OSHA collects only about half of the fines it hands out.
http://www.propublica.org/feature/acting-tough-when-cameras-leave-osha-penalties-wither-917
Acting Tough: When Cameras Leave, OSHA Penalties Wither
ProPublica reviewed the agency's previous 25 highest announced penalties [3]. In 19 cases, the fines were sharply reduced after appeals and negotiations, dropping an average of 65 percent. Three others were settled the day they were announced after closed-door talks between the agency and companies and three remain open. Citations for "willful" violations, which can bring criminal prosecution, were frequently adjusted to lesser charges that carry only civil penalties. Some cases plodded through the system; five dragged out for more than a decade.
...snip...
So WTH is going on? Why do we have and spend money on an agency like OSHA, if they are toothless?
http://dailyreporter.com/blog/2010/02/01/osha-seeks-budget-increase/
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration on Monday requested $573 million for fiscal 2011, a $14.5 million increase over the agency’s 2010 budget.
Two refineries owned by oil giant BP account for 97 percent of all flagrant violations found in the refining industry by government safety inspectors over the past three years, a Center for Public Integrity analysis shows. Most of BP’s citations were classified as “egregious willful” by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and reflect alleged violations of a rule designed to prevent catastrophic events at refineries.
BP is battling a massive oil well spill in the Gulf of Mexico after an April 20 platform blast that killed 11 workers. But the firm has been under intense OSHA scrutiny since its refinery in Texas City, Texas, exploded in March 2005, killing 15 workers. While continuing its probe in Texas City, OSHA launched a nationwide refinery inspection program in June 2007 in response to a series of fires, explosions and chemical releases throughout the industry.
Refinery inspection data obtained by the Center under the Freedom of Information Act for OSHA’s nationwide program and for the parallel Texas City inspection show that BP received a total of 862 citations between June 2007 and February 2010 for alleged violations at its refineries in Texas City and Toledo, Ohio.
Of those, 760 were classified as “egregious willful” and 69 were classified as “willful.” Thirty of the BP citations were deemed “serious” and three were unclassified. Virtually all of the citations were for alleged violations of OSHA’s process safety management standard, a sweeping rule governing everything from storage of flammable liquids to emergency shutdown systems. BP accounted for 829 of the 851 willful violations among all refiners cited by OSHA during the period analyzed by the Center.
Top OSHA officials told the Center in an interview that BP was cited for more egregious willful violations than other refiners because it failed to correct the types of problems that led to the 2005 Texas City accident even after OSHA pointed them out. In Toledo, problems were corrected in one part of the refinery but went unaddressed in another. Jordan Barab, deputy assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health, said it was clear that BP “didn’t go nearly far enough” to correct deficiencies after the 2005 blast.
“The only thing you can conclude is that BP has a serious, systemic safety problem in their company,” Barab said.
If BP was sooooooo unsafe, why didn't OSHA shut them down?
I love how after any disaster, OSHA is right there with lists of violations. Yet action by OSHA(other than fines) could possibly have prevented this and many tragedies.
Locally, I can recall the 2008 Imperial sugar refinery explosion in Savannah.
After the fact, OSHA issued numerous citations and fines.
Just found this. seems that OSHA collects only about half of the fines it hands out.
http://www.propublica.org/feature/acting-tough-when-cameras-leave-osha-penalties-wither-917
Acting Tough: When Cameras Leave, OSHA Penalties Wither
ProPublica reviewed the agency's previous 25 highest announced penalties [3]. In 19 cases, the fines were sharply reduced after appeals and negotiations, dropping an average of 65 percent. Three others were settled the day they were announced after closed-door talks between the agency and companies and three remain open. Citations for "willful" violations, which can bring criminal prosecution, were frequently adjusted to lesser charges that carry only civil penalties. Some cases plodded through the system; five dragged out for more than a decade.
...snip...
So WTH is going on? Why do we have and spend money on an agency like OSHA, if they are toothless?
http://dailyreporter.com/blog/2010/02/01/osha-seeks-budget-increase/
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration on Monday requested $573 million for fiscal 2011, a $14.5 million increase over the agency’s 2010 budget.