PDA

View Full Version : Starbucks: Letting Customers Wear Guns Is Just Business



Seca
03-03-2010, 06:23 PM
Never been but looks like I am gonna have to break down and finally buy a $4 coffee.



EATTTLE (AP) - Coffee chain Starbucks said Wednesday it's sticking to its policy of letting customers carry guns where it's legal and is asking not to be put in the middle of a larger gun-control debate.

The statement stems from recent incidents when gun owners have walked into Starbucks and other businesses to exercise and advertise their rights in states that allow people to openly carry firearms. Gun control advocates have protested.

Starbucks' backing of its policy comes ahead of a press conference on Wednesday by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence near Seattle's Pike Place Market, where the first Starbucks cafe opened.

Starbucks asked both gun enthusiasts and gun-control advocates "to refrain from putting Starbucks or our partners into the middle of this divisive issue."

The Brady campaign has circulated a petition that has more than 28,000 signatures demanding that Starbucks "offer espresso shots, not gunshots" and declare its coffeehouses "gun-free zones."

Even in some "open carry" states, businesses are allowed to ban guns in their stores. And some have, creating political confrontations with gun owners.

Starbucks said Tuesday that it complies with local laws in the 43 states that have open-carry weapon laws. Not to do so, the chain said, would make the chain "require our partners to ask law abiding customers to leave our stores, putting our partners in an unfair and potentially unsafe position."

It said security measures are in place for any "threatening situation" that might occur in stores.

"Starbucks is a special target because it's from the hippie West Coast, and a lot of dedicated consumers who pay $4 for coffee have expectations that Starbucks would ban guns. And here they aren't," said John Bruce, a political science professor at the University of Mississippi who is an expert in gun policy.

The fight for retailers heated up in early January when gun enthusiasts in northern California began walking into Starbucks and other businesses to test state laws that allow gun owners to carry weapons openly in public places. As it spread to other states, gun control groups quickly complained about the parade of firearms in local stores.

Some were spontaneous, with just one or two gun owners walking into a store. Others were organized parades of dozens of gun owners walking into restaurants with their firearms proudly at their sides.

In one case, about 100 activists bearing arms had planned to go to a California Pizza Kitchen in Walnut Creek, Calif., but after it became clear they weren't welcome they went to another restaurant. That chain and Peet's Coffee & Tea are among the businesses that have banned customers with guns.

Just as shops can deny service to barefoot customers, restaurants and stores in some states can declare their premises gun-free zones.

The advocacy group OpenCarry.org, a leading group encouraging the demonstrations, applauded Starbucks in a statement for "deciding not to discriminate against lawful gun carriers."

"Starbucks is seen as a responsible corporation and they're seen as a very progressive corporation, and this policy is very much in keeping with that," said John Pierce, co-founder of OpenCarry.org. "If you're going to support individual rights, you have to support them all. I applaud them, and I've gone out of my way personally to let every manager of every Starbucks I pass know that."

Gun control advocates hope the coffeehouse firearms displays end up aggravating more people than they inspire.

"If you want to dress up and go out and make a little political theater by frightening children in the local Starbucks, if that's what you want to spend your energy on, go right ahead," said Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady campaign. "But going out and wearing a gun on your belt to show the world you're allowed to is a little juvenile."

The coffeehouse debate has been particularly poignant for gun-control advocates in Washington state, where four uniformed police officers were shot and killed while working on their laptops at a suburban coffeehouse. The shooter later died in a gun battle with police.

Ralph Fascitelli of Washington Ceasefire, an advocacy group that seeks to reduce gun violence, said allowing guns in coffeehouses robs residents of "societal sanctuaries."

"People go to Starbucks for an escape, just so they can get peace," Fascitelli said. "But people walk in with open-carry guns and it destroys the tranquility."

Gun control advocates have been on the defensive. Their opponents have trumpeted fears that gun rights would erode under a Democrat-led White House and Congress, but President Obama and his top allies have largely been silent on issues such as reviving an assault weapons ban or strengthening background checks at gun shows.

Gun rights groups are looking to build on a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban, and cheered legislation that took effect Monday allowing licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks. Obama signed that legislation as part of a broader bill.

Legislators in Montana and Tennessee, meanwhile, have passed measures seeking to exempt guns made and kept in-state from national gun control laws. And state lawmakers elsewhere are considering legislation that would give residents more leeway to carry concealed weapons without permits.

Observers say the gun rights movement is using the Starbucks campaign to add momentum and energize its supporters.

"They're trying to change the culture with this broader notion of gun rights," said Clyde Wilcox, a Georgetown University government professor who has written a book on the politics of gun control. "I think they are pressing the notion that they've got a rout going, so why not just get what they can while they're ahead?"
(Copyright © 2010, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

impalanar
03-03-2010, 06:30 PM
Wow, didn't see that coming from them. But Kudos are due, who wants coffee?

NiceGuysFinishLast
03-03-2010, 06:55 PM
"If you want to dress up and go out and make a little political theater by frightening children in the local Starbucks, if that's what you want to spend your energy on, go right ahead," said Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady campaign. "But going out and wearing a gun on your belt to show the world you're allowed to is a little juvenile."


But how is trying to force people not to exercise their legal rights any less juvenile?

Mongo
03-03-2010, 06:58 PM
Juvenile is okay if it's being done to prove a point for your side...

I am feeling an urge for a quad shot latte.

Woodk61000
03-04-2010, 10:42 AM
Why is it needed for them to come out and say that they allow it? My rights and my firearms license allows me to carry wherever I want. They leftist hippy fags must have balls that drag the floor to go and start shit with someone with a gun hanging off their side. Reminds me of an old guy on a bus with a "I am a mother ****er" shirt on. Probably should have left him alone too!

Mongo
03-04-2010, 10:58 AM
Most states have laws in place that allow any business to declare themselves off limits for guns - no matter what permits or licenses you have.

Woodk61000
03-04-2010, 11:08 AM
Thats kinda the point of concealed carry. No one knows that I have a gun in my pocket right now. Unless I tell them.

Mongo
03-04-2010, 11:24 AM
Yep, however in some places if there's a sign, you can lose the license and do time...

Seca
03-04-2010, 12:09 PM
Yep, however in some places if there's a sign, you can lose the license and do time...

Signs hold NO legal weight in Georgia. The business owner can tell you to leave. If you do not leave you can get arrested for misdemeanor trespass which will not revoke your GFL. If you come back...well then that is a different story.

Mongo
03-04-2010, 01:26 PM
I never said GA.

Gamecock
03-04-2010, 02:04 PM
Who wants to meet at Starbuck for a Latte and clean our handguns?! :D

Hughduffel
03-04-2010, 10:58 PM
This isn't the most popular opinion on firearms forums, but I feel that flagrantly violating the rights and wishes of the property owner, concealed or not, makes you a hypocrite when you start harping on others about your own carry rights. I carry daily, everywhere I'm legal, and I have done this myself but I don't look at it as an entitlement like some people seem to.

Mongo
03-05-2010, 08:23 AM
I agree with you Hugh. It's their right to decide if they want guns in their establishment that's up to them. If we want to carry then we can choose to go there or not. Of course I feel the same way about smoking in bars...

Seca
03-05-2010, 10:38 AM
This isn't the most popular opinion on firearms forums, but I feel that flagrantly violating the rights and wishes of the property owner, concealed or not, makes you a hypocrite when you start harping on others about your own carry rights. I carry daily, everywhere I'm legal, and I have done this myself but I don't look at it as an entitlement like some people seem to.

+1 I believe we should be allowd to carry everywhere BUT believe private property owners/business should still have a right to say they dont want weapons in their stores etc.

Gmoney
03-05-2010, 11:49 AM
I think thier coffee is still overpriced and sucks and the weird people with the weird glasses sitting around on thier mac books or dorks.

Phatmax
03-05-2010, 04:04 PM
+1 I believe we should be allowd to carry everywhere BUT believe private property owners/business should still have a right to say they dont want weapons in their stores etc.

This, but then again, I don't patronize places that don't trust their customers.

Gmoney
03-05-2010, 04:16 PM
so you don't shop at places that have secuirty cameras??

TroyBoy30
03-05-2010, 04:19 PM
anytime I have been I was carrying anyways!

Phatmax
03-05-2010, 04:35 PM
so you don't shop at places that have secuirty cameras??

Smartass...

Criminals will ignore the signs and come in and shoot the place up if they want to.

Yet a store that has a "no legally carried gun" policy is telling you that even though you have passed an FBI and GBI background check, they don't trust you to be armed. But still, if someone was criminally inclined, that sign only means that the criminal does not have to worry that he might be confronted by a law-abiding citizen.

Security cameras are fine, in a store for documentation purposes. They are not singling out a specific group.

Woodk61000
03-05-2010, 05:03 PM
Agreed max! I keep mine concealed for the element of surprise. "Sure let me grab my money for you" Then you have a dead criminal.

Barton72
03-06-2010, 03:41 AM
Concealed all the way.

IceCreaMan
03-06-2010, 11:52 AM
alot of the security cameras you see are junk, especially in gas stations... starbucks more than likely have better grades though. an experienced concealed gun owner is a friend is most places

Seca
03-06-2010, 02:15 PM
This, but then again, I don't patronize places that don't trust their customers.

I do my best not to spend money at places that dont allow me to carry.


Agreed max! I keep mine concealed for the element of surprise. "Sure let me grab my money for you" Then you have a dead criminal.

Or you could open carry and completely deter a crime. Either way is good!